I'm just back from a pleasant and healthy bicycle excursion to the barn on a fine, sunny morning. Again, lines of white clouds streamed across a bright blue sky. The land has awakened and is alive with sprouting crops waving in the breeze, colourful blossom, and freshly clad trees.
One of the local farriers - legally protected from full competition under British law - had driven his vehicle into the barn, blocking access through the building. The barn owner was away at a show, so the iron-hanger thought that he could behave as it pleased him.
He was told by boarders that he was obstructing them, however declined to move his vehicle, telling them that they "would have to squeeze by one side".
One boarder did remove his horse from a box alongside the vehicle, squeezing him through a narrow space - hardly a safe procedure, and one which could readily have caused an accident to horse or person - whilst the iron-hanger looked on. There is a good flat concrete area outside - and the weather was fine - but the farriers all want to drive inside and become the centre of attention irrespective of the inconvenience and hazard that they cause.
This all too clearly brings into perspective the recent debate concering safety. Helmets, body protectors, etc may be a good idea, but why then magnify hazards in the first place by driving a vehicle into the middle of the barn? (Incidentally I don't leave my bicycle lying around the barn. When there are no horses in the aisle, I wheel it through and leave it behind with the wheelbarrows where horses don't go. I just stopped to take out my camera.)
The second photograph shows a finished front foot on the 13-yo mare that was being shod. This is typical of the horses in the barn, with collapsed heels and contracted frogs. The toe appears to have been rasped down to the white line, but evenly rather than the usual dubbing. Yet outwardly this horse is one of the less bad examples. The third photo shows a grey gelding that, frankly, is middle of the range for horses in South Oxfordshire. He "trips a lot", his rider says! There are Thoroughbreds in the barn that, to be quite honest, ought to be reported to the humane society although they are shod by a "qualified" farrier every six weeks without fail. Meanwhile none of the owners are poor, and no-one is trying to save money on hoof care.
For this quality of "service" horse owners pay ₤60-75 (say $80-100) for perhaps 45 minutes work - if there are a number of horses to be shod, as is usual, the farrier earns somewhere around ₤80 (around $110) an hour. I am a professional Project Manager working in the construction industry. For ₤80 an hour, I can hire a top-rate engineer with worldwide experience to design the structure for a ₤250 million bridge or a skilled architect who can design a world-class ₤25 million building. However, when it comes to horse care, ₤80 an hour buys a complacent and not especially skilled young man who cannot maintain horses' feet in good health.
That is not to say that a horse care professional should not earn ₤80 an hour (out of which taxes, insurance, pension scheme, etc need to be paid - as also with the engineer or architect.) But they must EARN it. I am happy to pay for all the skill and experience that the person brings, provided that they do bring plenty of skill and experience. A good hoofcare professional can have as much skill as an engineer or an architect - and some do. But, all too often, what we see in Britain is an antiquated version of farriery practiced badly and at a basic level of skill by a legally-protected clique so that good hooves deteriorate and bad hooves get worse. It does not need to be that way.