The UK is entrenched in magical reality. No-one tried to sell Brexit as anything other than easy. "Just vote 'leave', your leaders will fix some trade deals (naturally with the foreigners falling into line), and you'll have more money in your pockets." Really?
When Britain was faced with an existential threat, Churchill told the population how hard life would become. "I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat". At the time, he was not popular. (Churchill believed that he only felt he had the full support of parliament after the French fleet was shelled on his orders at Mers-el-Kebir, which says something about the UK - then and probably now too.) Not popular, perhaps, but honest.
Now, in contract, a population - many of whom are unproductive, unthinking and entitled - have been told that the way ahead will be easy. Every party sold some version of this myth. Whoever they had elected, the population would be disappointed, if not succoured with a greater myth that deepens their deception.
Improving living standards is a complex problem (one which involves people, beliefs, relationships and the like) as well as complicated (which is a essentially technical issue). It isn't simple, and pulling a few economic levers won't achieve much. This is the core of the lie.
The UK's deplorable productivity needs to be addressed. What little manufacturing takes place needs to be protected and expanded. (Not much point stopping our instruments of economic production being sold abroad as most of them already have.) Where is the honesty today?
The climate emergency needs to be addressed. It's hard enough to get people to look after their own interests, let alone those of generations following, but we must try. Not just let the boomers keep on consuming at the expense of those who follow to pick up the pieces. Where is the honesty today?
And it needs to be realised that sustainability comprises three strands: personal; social; and climate. Personal sustainability means having enough to live on, and social sustainability means living in a pleasant community. When these two are addressed - and only then - will there be consensus to help save the planet. That's where things fall down in the UK: policies designed to maintain inequality, and minimise the 'cost' of the poor to those with more, leave people pitted against one-another without space to think beyond the end of the week. The climate change deniers love that. Where is the honesty today?
After the words that I quoted above, Churchill said: "...with all our might and with all the strength that God can give us." Nowadays hardly anyone seems to believe in anything. Now an unspiritual generation seeks material gain for no more effort than placing a vote. They will be disappointed: for what good can come without effort? Without moral purpose? Indeed, without a moral revival? Without faith?